Rubistar
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )



    Integrating 21st Century Skills into your Curriculum


    Teacher Name: Ullah


    Student Name:     ________________________________________

CATEGORY
Exemplary
Good
Satisfactory
Emerging
Unsatisfactory
Content
1. Discussion contributions reference appropriate course materials 2) Assignments (project plan elements) show evidence that ideas from the course materials have been incorporated
1.Some discussion contributions reference appropriate course materials 2) Assignments (project plan elements) show some evidence that ideas from the course materials have been incorporated
1. A few discussion contributions reference appropriate course materials 2) Assignments (project plan elements) show a little evidence that ideas from the course materials have been incorporated
1. 1 or 2 discussion contributions reference appropriate course materials 2) Assignments (project plan elements) show minimal evidence that ideas from the course materials have been incorporated
1. Discussion contributions do not reference appropriate course materials 2) Assignments (project plan elements) do not show evidence that ideas from the course materials have been incorporated
Discussion
1. Clearly relates understanding of course content to teaching practice. 2. Discussion exhibits reflective thinking about course materials. 3. Respons to at least one other person's discussion posting with helpful feedback, ideas, resources
1. Relates understanding of course content to teaching practice. 2. Discussion exhibits reflective thinking about course materials. 3. Sometimes responds to at least one other person's discussion posting with helpful feedback, ideas, resources, but this is not consistent for all modules.
1. Discussion responses show limited and/or unclear connection to teaching practices. 2. Only minimal reflection on course materials is evident in discussions and assignments. 3. There is some response to the responses from other people in the course, and the comments are not always designed to give helpful feedback, ideas or resources.
1. Only a very few references are occasionally made to other course materials or other resources. 2. There is very little connection to current teaching practices.
1. No connection is made between course materials and other resources. 2. There is no clear connection of course material and resources with current teaching practice. 3. Does not participate consistently and discussions.
Assignments
1.Clearly relates course resources and assignments to other related literature, Web sites, experiences, or resources. 2. Clearly relates understanding of course content to teaching practice. 3. Responses to megacognition questions for each module are clearly thought through and articulated using information from course materials.
1 .Relates course resources and assignments to other related literature, Web sites, experiences, or resources. 2.Relates understanding of course content to teaching practice. 3. Responses to metacognition questions for each module are adequate, but deep reflection and clear input from course materials is only partially evident.
1.Some assignments reflect a minimal amount of connection to related literature, Web sites, experiences and resources. 2.Connection to teaching practices is inconsistent our unclear. 3. Metacognition questions for each module have been responded to, but response seems to be cursory.
1. Course materials do not seem to be reflected upon. 2. There is not a clear connection to teaching practice or personal need. 3. Some metacognition questions have been responded to.
1. There is little or now evidence of reflection upon course materials. 2. There is little or no evidence of a connection with teaching practice or personal need. 3. None of the metacognition questions have been responded to.
Project
1. Makes appropriate use of the Internet resources and information learned in this course. 2. Is appropriate for the grade level or personal need. 3. Reflects feedback from weekly discussions and assignments. 4. If this is a classroom project, it is clearly includes all the strategies required (See Project Instructions).
1. Makes use of the some Internet resources and course materials 2. Seems somewhat appropriate for grade level or personal need 3. If this is a classroom project, it seems to be standards based. Seems as though it could be appropriate for grade level. Project reflects most of the material and strategies required (See project Instructions).
1. Makes some use of the Internet resources and course materials 2. If this is a classroom project, it seems to be standards based, but the exact standards are not clear. Seems as though it could be appropriate for grade level or personal use, but intent is not completely clear. 3.Project reflects some of the material and strategies required (See project Instructions).
1. Makes minimal use of the Internet resources and course materials 2. If this is a classroom project,it is unclear for what age grade level it is targeted. 3. Project reflects minimal use of the material and strategies required (See project Instructions).
1. Is incomplete or not done. 2. Does not make use of the Internet Resources provided. 3. Purpose is not clear.


 Teacher Home



Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC

To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address:
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse