Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Preparedness
|
Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.
|
Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals.
|
The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.
|
Student does not seem at all prepared to present.
|
Time-Limit
|
Presentation is 5-6 minutes long.
|
Presentation is 4 minutes long.
|
Presentation is 3 minutes long.
|
Presentation is less than 3 minutes OR more than 6 minutes.
|
Vocabulary
|
Uses vocabulary appropriate for the audience. Extends audience vocabulary by defining words that might be new to most of the audience.
|
Uses vocabulary appropriate for the audience. Includes 1-2 words that might be new to most of the audience, but does not define them.
|
Uses vocabulary appropriate for the audience. Does not include any vocabulary that might be new to the audience.
|
Uses several (5 or more) words or phrases that are not understood by the audience.
|
Collaboration with Peers
|
Almost always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Tries to keep people working well together.
|
Usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Does not cause "waves" in the group.
|
Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group but sometimes is not a good team member.
|
Rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Often is not a good team member.
|
Evaluates Peers
|
Fills out peer evaluation completely and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend).
|
Fills out almost all of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend).
|
Fills out most of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend).
|
Fills out most of the peer evaluation but scoring appears to be biased.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |