Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Information
|
All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.
|
Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.
|
Rebuttal
|
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak.
|
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant
|
Use of Facts/Statistics
|
Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.
|
Every point was not supported.
|
Organization
|
All arguments were clearly tied to the team's main argument and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
Most arguments were clearly tied to the team's main argument and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
All arguments were clearly tied to the team's main argument but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.
|
Arguments were not clearly tied to the team's main argument.
|
Presentation Style
|
The speaker consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
|
The speaker usually used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
|
The speaker sometimes used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
|
The speaker had a presentation style that did not keep the attention of the audience.
|
Persuasive techniques
|
The speaker clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information persuasively and convincingly. Emotive language, repetition, striking anecdotes, personal direct quotes from stakeholders and a compelling metaphor were used to involve the audience.
|
The speaker clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information persuasively, using some of the possible rhetorical techniques.
|
The speaker seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented these with few attempts to view persuade the audience.
|
The speaker did not show an adequate understanding of the topic and did not attempt to persuade the audience.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |