Rubistar
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )



    Merion Mercy Public Speaking Rubric


    Teacher Name: Ms. Sack


    Student Name:     ________________________________________

CATEGORY
4
3
2
1
Score
Verbal Effectiveness
The speaker enunciated clearly and spoke fluently. She effectively changed volume and rate of delivery to convey meaning. Excellent vocal variety engaged the audience. Speaker skillfully used pauses to emphasize significant points.
The speaker enunciated clearly most of the time and spoke with some fluency. She used some changes in volume and rate to emphasize meaning. Reasonable vocal variety throughout most of the presentation. Pauses were used but not always in a meaningful way.
The speaker did not enunciate clearly. Fluency was sporadic. Speaker used few changes in volume or rate. At times the audience could not hear clearly. Minimal vocal variety did not keep the audience engaged. Pauses were awkward when used.
The speaker enunciated poorly, and her delivery was choppy. The audience had difficulty hearing throughout the presentation. The speaker employed little variation in tone, volume, or rate of delivery.
 
Nonverbal Effectiveness
The speaker was poised and confident at all times. She used meaningful, specific gestures throughout the presentation to enhance meaning. She demonstrated no distracting body movements. The speaker maintained excellent eye contact with all segments of the audience and varied her facial expressions to accentuate the natural flow of thoughts and emotions.
The speaker was generally poised and spoke with confidence throughout most of the presentation. Gestures were somewhat specific and not repeated. The speaker had some distracting body movements such as shifting weight or wringing hands. She maintained good eye contact. Some facial expressions enhanced the delivery.
The speaker did not appear confident. Awkward posture and distracting body movements lessened the effectiveness of the presentation. Gestures were limited or stiff. Eye contact was minimal and/or limited to specific areas of the room. Facial expressions did not change much.
The speaker seemed uncomfortable and not in control of her body. She made little eye contact with the audience and used almost no gestures.
 
Language
The speaker used sophisticated and concise language that was appropriate to the content. Varied word choices added to the effectiveness of the presentation. Any grammatical mistakes were minor. When appropriate, rhetorical devices and language techniques such as imagery, simile and metaphor were used well.
The speaker used clear and appropriate language but with less sophistication than a level 4 presentation. Some variety of word choices. Few grammatical mistakes. Some successful use of rhetorical devices and figurative language.
The speaker's word choices were bland and/or not precise. Some unnecessary repetition of words. Grammatical mistakes affected the clarity of meaning. Little, if any, use of rhetorical devices or figurative language.
The speaker's word choices were poor and did not adequately convey the content. Frequent grammatical mistakes made it difficult for the audience to comprehend the meaning.
 
Structure and Development
The introduction was interesting and engaged the audience. Major points were clearly defined. Sequencing was logical and transitions were effective. The conclusion was clear and forceful.
The introduction was clear, but did not make a strong impact. Most main points were clearly defined. Sequencing showed some thoughtful planning. Most transitions flowed well. The conclusion was clear and competent.
The introduction was not well-developed. Main points were not clearly defined or adequately explained. Sequencing was sometimes random and/or difficult to follow. Some transitions were awkward. The conclusion needed development and lacked impact.
The introduction lacked focus. Main points were not defined. Information was organized poorly, and transitions were awkward. The conclusion was abrupt and limited.
 
Content
The presentation fulfilled all requirements of the assignment. Thorough preparation/research was evident. The speaker demonstrated a command of facts and information. Explanations/analyses were sound.
The presentation met most requirements of the assignment. Preparation and research were evident. The speaker demonstrated some command of facts and information. Explanations/analyses were partially developed.
The presentation failed to meet significant requirements of the assignment. Little evidence of preparation and research. Command of facts and information was insufficient. Explanations/analyses were confusing.
The presentation failed to meet most significant requirements of the assignment. Little evidence of preparation or research was provided. Speaker had a limited understanding of the facts.
 
Use of Visual Aids(optional)
The speaker adeptly integrated visual aids/notes into her presentation. Use of such enhanced the delivery and the audience's appreciation.
The speaker used required elements with some skill. Notes/visuals enhanced the presentation rather than being a distraction to the audience.
The speaker handled notes/visual aids awkwardly. They were a source of some distraction for the audience.
Required notes/visual aids were missing or used poorly.
 
Overall average score
 
 
 
 
 


 Teacher Home



Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC

To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address:
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse