La rúbrica fue hecha usando:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
CATEGORY
|
7 to 8 points
|
5 to 6 points
|
3 to 4 points
|
1 to 2 points
|
Content
|
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
|
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
|
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.
|
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.
|
Organization
|
Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
|
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
|
Content is logically organized for the most part.
|
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
|
Attractiveness
|
Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
|
Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.
|
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.
|
Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content.
|
Mechanics
|
No misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.
|
Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
|
More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.
|
Presentation
|
Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
|
Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time.
|
Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.
|
Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.
|
Requirements
|
Students have compared the two religions with exceptional detail.
|
Students have compared the two religions with adequate detail.
|
Students have compared the two religions with some detail.
|
Students have compared the two religions with little or no detail.
|
Workload
|
The workload is divided and shared equally by all
team members.
|
The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person.
|
The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work.
|
The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |