Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

Participation

Provides practical and prudent concepts for the group. Participated in all group sessions. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort.

Usually provides practical ideas when participating in the group sessions. A strong group member who tries hard!

Sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the group sessions. A satisfactory group member who does what is required.

Rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group sessions. May refuse to participate.

Teamwork

Enhances brainstorming as a group. Encourages individual efforts within the group. Listens and shares with the different mindsets of the group. Tries to keep people working well together.

Contributes to the collaboration of the group. Usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Does not cause ripples within the team.

Partakes occasionally within the brainstorming efforts of the group. Somewhat listens, supports, and shares ideas with the group, but sometimes is not a good team member.

Rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Often is not a good team player. Likes to create ripples in the team and be center of attention.

Preparedness

Each aspect of the IRP Project was completed on time and submitted on or before the assigned due dates. All group members were present when each aspect of the IRP was due, and were able to answer any questions pertaining to the project and its components.

Each aspect of the IRP Project was completed on time and submitted on assigned due dates. One group member was not available on the assigned due dates. However, all questions regarding the project were answered.

Each aspect of the IRP Project was completed on time and submitted on assigned due dates. Two or more group members were absent on the assigned due dates. Not all questions regarding the project were answered.

Each aspect of the IRP Project was submitted after the assigned due dates. Several group members were absent on the assigned due dates. Not all questions regarding the project were answered.

Quality of Work

Every aspect of the IRP project was competed. Mission statement, and Office policies, design, and slogan were all correctly placed in the PowerPoint presentation, with transitions and animations. The group went above and beyond all aspects of the IRP project.

The IRP project was missing a few minor details regarding the dental office and its policies. The group provided a PowerPoint presentation of their dental office with transitions and animations. The group followed all directions of the IRP project. Creativity was evident.

The IRP project was missing or incorrectly stated proper dental office procedures/polices. The group did not provide transitions and animations to their PowerPoint presentation. The slides were out of order and the project lacked creativity. The final project was less than average.

The IRP project was lacking in all areas and missing key components. The group did not provide transitions and animations to their PowerPoint presentation. The presentation lacked organization and creativity, and it was poorly presented.