Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Focus on Topic (Content)
|
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
|
Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general.
|
Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information.
|
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.
|
Adding Personality (Voice)
|
The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
|
The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic.
|
The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
|
The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
|
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions)
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Capitalization & Punctuation (Conventions)
|
Writer makes no errors in capitalization or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read.
|
Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read.
|
Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow.
|
Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow.
|
Discussion Responses
|
Discussion responses to peers are timely and thoughtful. New ideas are introduced or opinions are supported. The response remains on topic.
|
Discussion responses to peers are late, but the quality of the post shares a new idea or a supported opinion. The response remains on topic.
|
Discussion responses are off topic, or do not share new ideas or supported opinions.
|
Discussion responses show little reflection and are not timely.
|
Completion of Assignments
|
Writer participated in all requested discussions and postings. Writers responded to one or more peers during discussion postings.
|
Writer participated in the majority of required discussions and responded to one peer.
|
Writer participation in discussion posting and peer responses was not consistent.
|
Writer posted but did not respond to other peers.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |