Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

CATEGORY

4-5

3

2

1

Sources

3 Sources Well Cited

2 Sources Well Cited

1 Source Well Cited

Sources not cited.

Electronic Notes

Electronic notes submitted for all sources with bibliography.

Electronic notes submitted for some sources with bibliography.

Incomplete electronic notes submitted.

Notes completed, but not submitted electronically.

Organization

Peer Evaluation: Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.

Peer Evaluation: Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.

Peer Evaluation: Content is logically organized for the most part.

Peer Ealuation: There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.

Content

Fully answers prompt question.Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.

Partially answers prompt question. Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.

Attempts to answer prompt question.Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.

Does not clearly answer prompt question. Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.

Computer Presentation

Peer Evaluation: Presentation knocked my socks off. WOW!!!

Peer Evaluation: Presentation is enjoyable.

Peer evaluation: Presentation is easy to follow.

Peer Evaluation: Presentation is confusing.

Attractiveness

Peer Evaluation: Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.

Peer Evaluation: Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.

Peer Evaluation: Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

Peer Evaluation: Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.