Rubistar
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )



    Class Debate : Wiki Debate: Animal Testing


    Teacher Name: Mr. Janelli


    Student Name:     ________________________________________

CATEGORY
4
3
2
1
Respect for Other Team
All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language.
Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not.
Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark.
Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful.
Information
All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.
Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.
Rebuttal
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.
Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak.
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant
Use of Facts/Statistics
Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.
Every point was not supported.
Organization
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.
Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise).
Understanding of Topic
The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly.
The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease.
The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease.
The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Sentence Writing
Demonstrates skillful sentence fluency (varies length, good flow rhythm, and varied structure).
Demonstrates reasonable sentence fluency.
Demonstrates minimal sentence fluency.
Sentence fluency is lacking.


 Teacher Home



Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC

To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address:
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse