|
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
|
CATEGORY
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
|
Information
|
All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.
|
Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.
|
|
Analysis of Information
|
Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.
|
Every point was not supported.
|
|
Use of voice
|
The team used voice and body language well enabling them to express their information forcefully and convincingly.
|
The team almost always used voice and body language well to present their information with ease.
|
The team sometimes used voice and body language to present their ideas with some ease.
|
The team did not demonstrate their much if any use of voice or body language to present their information.
|
|
Respect for Other Team
|
All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language. Active listening shown through out.
|
Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not. Active listening detected.
|
Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark. Lack of active listening easily detected.
|
Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful.
|
| Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |