RubiStar

Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

>> To save this document onto your computer, please choose File :: Save As from your Browser Menu.

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

Identifying intellectual/social needs of each age group x 2.5

Student clearly and adeptly identifies needs and challenges of each age group for which their activities attend.

Student has identified needs but may not have identified them all and for each age group in a consistent manner.

Clearly some needs are not identified, nor adequately examined.

The majority of needs are not attended to in even the most general of terms.

Creation of activities for each x 5

Activities are clearly explained and adroitly developed to show exactly how they will aid in the development or reconciliation of challenges of the age for which they are to attend.

Most all activities are proficiently examined and defended as to how they can aid individuals at the age for which they attend.

Some activities are only generally defended or examined for how they can aid individuals for which they attend.

Activities identified may not even be age appropriate, or are not even defended, or are based on misinformed belief.

Aesthetic integrity of work x 5

The student has created a piece of work that is mature, or insightful, or unique. There is a very distinct level of aesthetic integrity to the student's work. No errors of any type are present.

Work is proficiently done. There is a proficient level of aesthetic merit to work. There are only minor errors or inconsistencies in work presented.

Some errors clearly evident through-out work. Lack of care in producing a work which warrants recognition beyond the most satisfactory level of effort.

Little attempt is made to make the finished product to have any aesthetic merit in any way. Work is so replete with error that messages may be difficult to discern.

Coordinated effort of students use of class time x 2.5

If done as a pair, finished work shows cooperation and allocation of time that reflects cooperation and consideration. Time is used well in and outside of class.

Some challenges may be evident, but work is done well. Student may have left things to the last minute, but was able to pull off a well executed product.

Time use was not done well. Student left things to the last minute. Class time was not used to resolve time management issues.

Students, by the quality of their work, were not able to coordinate their efforts very well. They would have been better off working on their own. Class time is wasted.