|
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
|
CATEGORY
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
|
Organization
|
Students present information in a logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
|
Students present information in logical sequence which audience can follow.
|
Audience has difficulty following presentation because students jump around and/or interrupt each other.
|
Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
|
|
Subject Knowledge
|
Students demonstrate full knowledge (more than required) by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration.
|
Students are familiar with information and provide answers to all questions, but fail to demonstrate clear knowledge of research area.
|
Students are uncomfortable with information and struggle with answering questions.
|
Students do not have grasp of information; cannot answer questions about subject.
|
|
Oral Component
|
Students use a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
|
Student voices are clear. Students pronounce most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
|
Student's voices are low. Students incorrectly pronounce terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
|
Students mumble, incorrectly pronounce terms or speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.
|
|
Visual Appeal
|
The poster is visually appealing; it uses a combination of text and graphics to express information.
|
The poster is visually appealing, but may contain too much information or be disorganized; font sizes may be difficult to read with few graphics.
|
The poster is visually appealing, but does not contain enough information or does not contain relevant graphic information.
|
The poster consists of text only or may appear to have been hastily assembled.
|
|
Strength of Material
|
Students provide relevent examples and facts; conclusions/ideas are supported by evidence; audience left with full understanding of evidence presented.
|
Students provide some examples and facts that support the subject; conclusions/ideas are given, but it is unclear what evidence is being presented.
|
Students provide weak examples and facts; very little evidence is given to support ideas/conclusions.
|
Students do not provide specific examples and facts; totally insufficient support for ideas or conclusions; evidence is not provided, audience left with no new information.
|
| Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |