Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

Videography -Clarity

Video did not rock/shake and the focus was excellent throughout.

Video did not rock/shake and the focus was excellent for the majority of the video.

Video had a little rocking/shaking, but the focus was excellent throughout .

Problems with rocking/shaking AND focus.

Videography-Interest

Many different "takes", camera angles, sound effects, and/or careful of use of zoom provided variety in the video.

Several (2-3) different "takes", camera angles, sound effects, and/or careful of use of zoom provided variety in the video.

One or two different "takes", camera angles, sound effects, and/or careful of use of zoom provided variety in the video.

Little attempt was made to provide variety in the video.

Length of Video

Video was over 1 minute and 30 seconds long.

Video was between 1 minute and 1 minute and 30 seconds long.

Video was under 1 minute long

Video was less than 30 seconds

Lower Thirds

All titles are accurate, legible and draw the viewer's attention.

Most titles are accurate, legible and draw the viewer's attention.

Some titles are accurate, legible and draw the viewer's attention.

Few (less than 75%) titles are accurate, legible and draw the viewer's attention.

Knowledge

All talent showed excellent knowledge of content, needing no cues and showing no hesitation in talking or answering questions.

All talent showed excellent knowledge of content, but 1-2 students once needed help or note cards to talk or answer questions.

Most talent showed excellent knowledge of content, but 1-2 often needed help or note cards to talk or answer questions.

Most talent needed help or note cards to talk and to answer questions.

Questions & Answers

Host was prepared and talent provided excellent. om-depth answers supported by facts were provided by all interviewed

Questions asked by the host and appropriate, but brief answers were provided by all interviewed

Questions asked by the host were awkward and vague answers were provided by several of the people interviewed

Answers were unclear and served no purpose in the interview