Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
CATEGORY
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Partially Proficient
|
Developing
|
Adding Personality (Voice)
|
The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
|
The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic.
|
The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
|
The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
|
Capitalization & Punctuation (Conventions)
|
Writer makes no errors in capitalization or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read.
|
Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read.
|
Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow.
|
Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow.
|
Flow & Rhythm (Sentence Fluency)
|
All sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and has an obvious emphasis.
|
Almost all sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 are stiff and awkward or difficult to understand.
|
Most sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but several are stiff and awkward or are difficult to understand.
|
The sentences are difficult to read aloud because they sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or difficult to understand.
|
Word Choice
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced.
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone.
|
Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair.
|
Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches may be present and detract from the meaning.
|
Introduction (Organization)
|
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and support. Three reasons are stated in an interesting way.
|
The introduction clearly states the main topic and support statement. The three main reasons are stated.
|
The introduction states the main topic, but is missing other critical components.
|
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or the reasons are not stated clearly
|
Support for Topic (Content)
|
Each paragraph contains a topic sentence relating to the supporting reason, with at least two supporting details.
|
One paragraph may be missing in structure.
|
Two paragraphs may be missing in structure.
|
All paragraphs are missing in structure.
|
Conclusion (Organization)
|
The conclusion is strong, restates the support and reasons and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at." It ends with a zip.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, and the support and reasons are restated, and ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends. The support or reasons are not restated.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |