Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Sources - accuracy of documentation
|
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in MLA format.
|
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a few are not in MLA format.
|
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are not in MLA format.
|
Some sources are not accurately documented.
|
Number of Sources in Powerpoint
|
Exceeds three print sources and three internet sources.
|
Contains three print sources and three internet sources.
|
Contains less than three print sources and three internet sources.
|
No sources listed.
|
Quality of Information
|
Information in source clearly relates to the invention. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. It is from a reputable institution (authoritative).
|
Information clearly relates to the invention. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. Authority of source is good.
|
Information clearly relates to the invention. No details and/or examples are given. Authority of source is questionable.
|
Information has little or nothing to do with the invention.
|
Sources not chosen for Powerpoint
|
Annotation clearly explains why source was rejected for inclusion in powerpoint.
|
Annotation somewhat explains why source not included.
|
Annotation doesn't explain why source was rejcted.
|
No Annotation provided.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |