Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar
( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Knowledge Gained
|
All students in group could easily and correctly state several facts about every story read and used for the game without looking at the game.
|
All students in the group could easily and correctly state 1-2 facts about every story read and used for the game without looking at the game.
|
Most students in the group could easily and correctly state 1-2 facts about the stories read and used for the game without looking at the game.
|
Several students in the group could NOT correctly state facts about the stories read and used for the game without looking at the game.
|
Accuracy of Content
|
All information cards made for the game are correct. and every story read is represented with1-2 images and activities within the game
|
All but one of the information cards made for the game are correct.Almost every story read is represented with1-2 images and activities within the game
|
All but two of the information cards made for the game are correct. half or more of the stories read are represented but with only one image per story.
|
Several information cards made for the game are not accurate. and less than half the stories read are represented with less than 1 images and activities per story
|
Attractiveness
|
Contrasting colors and at least 14 original graphics or drawings were used to give the cards and gameboard visual appeal.
|
Contrasting colors and at least 7 original graphic were used to give the cards and gameboard visual appeal.
|
Contrasting colors and 3 "borrowed" graphics were used to give the cards and gameboard visual appeal.
|
Little or no color or fewer than 3 graphics were included.
|
Rules
|
Rules were written clearly enough that all could easily participate.
|
Rules were written, but one part of the game needed slightly more explanation.
|
Rules were written, but people had some difficulty figuring out the game.
|
The rules were not written.
|
Cooperative work
|
The group worked well together with all members contributing significant amounts of quality work.
|
The group generally worked well together with all members contributing some quality work.
|
The group worked fairly well together with all members contributing some work.
|
The group often did not work well together and the game appeared to be the work of only 1-2 students in the group.
|
Creativity
|
The group put a lot of thought into making the game interesting and fun to play as shown by creative questions, game pieces and/or game board.
|
The group put some thought into making the game interesting and fun to play by using textures, fancy writing, and/or interesting characters.
|
The group tried to make the game interesting and fun, but some of the things made it harder to understand/enjoy the game.
|
Little thought was put into making the game interesting or fun.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |