Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

CATEGORY

3

2

1

Cognitive Level

Students clearly understand and explain the affect of the specified productivity tool on the cognitive level of the lesson in terms of Bloom's Taxonomy.

Students refer to the affect of the specified tool on the cognitive level, but do not explain the cognitive affect of the tool on the lesson in detail.

Students either refer to an inappropriate cognitive level, or do not attempt to explain the affect of the specified tool on the lesson.

Efficiency of Lesson

Students clearly explain how the lesson's time management is enhanced by the use of the specified productivity tool.

Students mention that the productivity tool improves efficiency, but do not explain specifically how this is achieved.

Students do not relate how the use of the speficied productivity tool makes the lesson more efficient

Use of Tool

Students clearly understand and explain how using the tool makes the each lesson a more powerful learning experience.

Students have a basic insight into how the lessons are better because the specified productivity tool is used.

Students do not refer to how the lesson is improved through use of the specified productivity tool.

URLs for Ideas

The Word Document contains 2 elementary and 2 secondary implementation ideas for the specified productivity tool along with URLs or supporting information for each idea.

The Word Document is missing an elementary and/or secondary implementation idea for the specified productivity tool. URLs or supporting information are included for listed ideas.

The Word Document is missing one or more elementary and/or secondary implementation idea for the specified productivity tool. In addition, lessons are missing URLs or supporting information.

Word Document

Implementation Ideas for the specified productivity tool are posted correctly and on time.

Implementation Ideas are posted incorrectly or late.

Implementation Ideas are not posted.